Monday, December 10, 2012

Because of the divorce Paul McCartney could not play up to "The Time Machine"

Makarevich Kutikov, Margulis, Derzhavin, Efremov - - eventually the whole team "driver" is ready to exhale with relief: now they are really five minutes to "The Beatles" to present. Musicians have just returned from London, where the second studio Abbey Road to record a new album. In popular mass consciousness, the studio famous for the fact that they recorded all of their albums The Beatles present. According to them, there was not even repairs and left it to the Liverpool energy rock magicians were all soaked walls and tools. Also console remained the same, and it is still in business. On this record, within these walls, breathing air that may still imbued with what some microscopic bacteria worked from breathing Lennon, Starr, Harrison and McCartney our rock wizards her musical magic. They came himself, George Martin, the great Mr. Martin, the reason Liverpool informed uneducated youth and perfected naive, helpless, although insanely talented. The makings of future world of rock stars "He is a noble English gentleman, very well trained, taught, and great in professionalism" - now enthusiastically recalls Alexander Kutikov acquaintance. "Music Bridge" for "rider" in London composer and co-producer contributions Vladimir Matetskiy, knowledgeable building in the London music world many turns and exits. As a result, the second co-producer of the upcoming muzotkroveniya of "Time Machine" Hamish Stuart - known guitarist and a bassist who has worked with Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr. To record a track "MV" by Sir Paul himself, the megasensatsiey would, but the poor man had McCartney at a time when he stepped all our rough rock community must have had problems with the divorce. Heather Mills was extremely evil aunt and rolls on the ex-Beatle such dreadful carts that our "driver" hair stand on end. - Of course this is all nonsense is what they about how McCartney took her crutches, tells hidden car in the refrigerator until they could not get -. Sure, for example, Alexander Kutikov - Simply put, this problem - to destroy and destroy McCartney in the eyes of public opinion, which said in England, honestly, do not like it because of its very own zhlobskih actions. Here it is, for example, recently required to change the order of authorship in the writing of the songs, "The Beatles", which he wrote with traditional Lennon-McCartney opposite. Many, it is strongly distorted. But that's another topic. A prosecution for his wife's influence on him, and he obviously could not come to us for the record ... The group stopped in Moscow for a few days to get back to London soon and continue the recording, listen to not only the party of the musician, and orchestral arrangements of natural English. How this "Beatles" are. "W." to make haste to "drivers" of their feelings and ask the first question Kutikova Alexander, whose head now adorns the magnificent rocker hair: ZD: Sasha, it's true that hair you grown specifically for this record at Abbey Road ? Kutikov: For ten years I went with short hair. But when we started writing new songs, I felt that something was in my appearance that state, I created fit. My friend Andrew (Makarevich) said, "Why do not you let your hair?". I thought and thought and decided to release the remnants of hair. Unfortunately, this is not what I had 30 years ago. But this hairstyle, I think, more in line with my current experience of life and the mood of the songs. ZD: A Makarevich not grow - all equally noble and gray. Andrew, I would like on this trembling sensations to visit the personal studio musicians hear, "The Beatles". Akin to this powerlessness fanatics in the grave of the Lenin Mausoleum? Makarevich: I do not know anything like this in the mausoleum, I have not tested. But before you go to Abbey Road, I found myself, as I show, all had seen your friends, musicians and the dog the envy in their eyes. And then I realized that nothing can not say. TE: And we thought that now pour stream of emotional delight ... Makarevich: Emotionally, I broke when I was there six months ago on the tour. We were brought to eight in the morning. It was very strict, on tiptoe, because nine began to work in groups and orchestras, and he had to go without touching the instrument. Slipped past the concerned business people. And of course it was a sense of time travel and worship knees before the holy grave. And when we got there for the second time, even at work, I first realized that I already put on airs - in conversation with his input - here the stairs - there, so - in short, the second studio album - it .. . Second was such a positive, mixed with some strain, which was to be admired. The time is short, our producer sure that we write more than I thought I was in turn is worried, because I know how good the quality of our game in the studio - we were never work superstudiynymi musicians in concerts, we better. But once we take the first, and I heard the sound of letting go. TE: Can this be compared to the work in our studios? Makarevich: There is in my view a fundamental difference. In principle, all the same. Studio is GDRZ very similar, the same size, to touch a sense of holiness passes the Beatles console quickly, and you begin to see how it works ... But there is - both. In our studio, if you set the tone, every sound he chooses out how to fix that, he added, Tops, Bottoms, guitar and say, finally install, shit, there is no other, that's our Take try ... And then the most important man - a musician. If you set up your amp, and you like it, the engineer can not say you have some shitty sound. He is obliged to transfer the sound on the film so that you liked and you gasped. It is to change the microphone, move it, move up, say silently to you on foot all the time, well, well, well, now would be even better, so listen. And it scares you to bring in your own eyes. Nobody will teach you all behave very nicely, including the producer. I've been on his face just trying to see if it all, or something similar, maybe not look. We did pull the tick out of it. ZD: Well, what the remote legendary Beatles? How does this treasure? Makarevich: It's a bit like that ... not on a gas stove ... I have seen similar things in the power ... The Sayano-Shushenskaya. These gray-metal color thing. He lamp has sound - the sound of which we dream (when a young man listening to "The Beatles") and wore that. The sound is warm and lively. And if you listen to both of the guitar is the sound and go, it is quite reassuring. ZD: Is this rarity with warm sound outdated technically and morally for modern records? Makarevich: On the contrary, it is a unique tool that allows us to achieve the effects practically available modern digital technologies. They even have microphones are mainly used in those years. ZD: But if this plate were not written Beatles, it would be saved? Makarevich: The Beatles were not the first there. In this remote and written by Glenn Miller and Ella Fitzgerald, and the band Kinks, and Fred Astaire and Yehudi Menuhin ... So he has a lot more advantages. I realized one thing: all these old microphones - this is no retro love. For while the microphone it cost much more than today. Because a microphone wire that directly to the film. Well, if the EQ Pro Tulsa and all sorts of things you can clean up, retouch, cut the frequency that is ugly, then he turned to the microphone seems to be less in demand. And then there's the whole thing. Therefore acted like a spaceship. ZD: What was it all technological progress, when all modern so much worse in the past? Makarevich: In my understanding, this is connected with the theory of competitive harm when to interrupt the market, you need to make things better, but at the expense of slightly worse. Then it becomes a standard quality, and everything happens again. There are, of course, fans of high-end (high quality), but compared to the majority of customers are very few sound. Kutikov: I agree with Andrew partially. The fact that progress is not always determined by the majority and the minority. And in the recording progress is due to a minority. Around the same Tulsa, special program - something that will help a very good musician to solve very complex problems ... Makarevich: ... and bad musicians, it helps to solve the problem ... only Kutikov: An example of what I'm talking about, can be used to insert the next CD "The Beatles" in November. ZD: You do not have deleted records? Kutikov: Its made by George Martin and his son. It took no other sounds, no new track. Everything is made from old records. But how! In 5.1 stereo, with a fantastic sound engineer! Those who have heard pieces of the plate say that this is an entirely new kind of "The Beatles" is based on the original old sounds. It's amazing and it's all done with about Tulsi. TE: To register this legendary studio, you will probably chose particularly inspiring things? Makarevich: We do not choose, we wrote. About half a year we wrote 13 songs, five of us sat in a small room. Together before we compose nearly not. There were only about five songs that we wrote together. I really do not believe in the idea, because for me, the process of writing -. Something intimate But it turned out that it works. Sometimes appear very good twists. ZD: What do you all think - to satisfy ambition? Makarevich: the idea of recording at Abbey Road was necessary for us in the first place. And not as a kind of self-promotion, because the process of vulgar brag, brag about the desired result. I just thought that in a sacred place for us to raise our spirits to new heights, so that we can play and sing better than we used to. ZD: How to self-awareness? Played-sung? Makarevich: Well, that's not for us to judge, and to you, but also for the self - not crap. ZD: The "collective" works quite differently than what was done before you? Makarevich: I do not know. We have never tried to the next album some fundamental revolution. We write songs, they always get very different. Each plate has a lot of songs come with a distinctive sound. TE: Andrew, what you mentioned about the revolution in the works, and on television recently showed the movie "Soul" of the early 80s with you, Rotaru and Boyarsky. It was, if you remember, when the overwhelming stagnation and hard battle against the Red regime dissent, including cultural. Makarevich: First of all it was a good movie musical. It was invented. By the way, not for ourselves but for Alla Pugacheva The whole scenario was written for her. But while all this was allegedly punched - then it was very difficult - the director Alexander Stefanovich act had the terrible scandal divorce with Alla B., and of course she refused, in his film. Then Stefanovic says singer number one we do not know who is No. 2? Rotary? That's it, and let us. ZD: But Allah is the trick for her breasts and then "Time Machine" ... Followed Makarevich: For them, it was a feat. It would come and sing. Well sung. Rotaru and it was quite a trick. ZD: I looked and could not break away, remembering how breakthrough was when this movie. People went several times on the screen only in clear title written "rock band" The Time Machine to read. "This was seen as a bold challenge to the system and the guys in the pocket of the hated regime. Years passed revive political monopoly, stifling dissent harassed freedom, the country was again political prisoners and dissidents. I catch myself thinking that the once revolutionary insurgency group love now only hiccup in the well-fed goodness sing, labor-la-la of an elderly invalid girlfriends and forget about the old mission commitment regime ... Why? After all, this is "The Beatles" .. . Makarevich, "The Beatles" No, they were not rebels. I assure you. They love the music they wanted to play. And they understood that the other teams are playing a little out of the way they want, and a little worse than they are. If you call it rebellion, then probably. We are afraid, not like what's playing vocal and instrumental ensembles in the country. We wanted to play other music. We began to play, and we will continue to play. ZD: But it still was not just in music. Her lyrics are much braver VIA pacifier, and against the then newspapers 'Time' existing call to revolt ... Makarevich: Of course, in verse, was also the case. But on this record we will poems very hard. ZD: If the newly minted brand dictatorship? Makarevich: We do not cancel. And I do not even prosecutors. ZD: What's with "Today is the best day to day struggle with fools ..."? What about all those "puppet", "fire", "Spark", "turn", and? Makarevich: My goal has always been - in verse say what I feel and what I think. In this sense, I have not changed. If in a given situation at a given time interval, is all that is going on the same with what I feel and think, it will probably seem gracious. But this happens very rarely. There is always something going on, what annoys you. But I repeat - I always hated the role of a social pamphleteer. If I do not like something, I say so explicitly, regardless of whether it is allowed or not allowed to do. Just to hear the new record. It follows ... damn ... not quite what you are saying. TE: Do you think that the times were back, but the truth can be told only by Aesop speeches, as before? Makarevich: That's exactly äsopischer language in my head is gone. Now everyone in the clear.

No comments:

Post a Comment